

|
Though two of our State Representatives, Representative Larry Balow (D) and Representative Tom Lothian (R) attempted to show their their progressive thinking, their courage in setting aside "party politics," and their commitment to people and animals in Wisconsin by proposing Budget amendments to restore the Pet Facilities in its original language with its self-funding features, only Rep. Balow's proposal made it to a vote. Apparently, Rep. Louthian was prevented by the current the Republican "no budget amendment" policy. Despite a HUGE outpouring of letters, phone calls and e-mails to our legislators...the Republicans DID NOT heed our pleas for reinstatement of the Pet Facilities Law. They allowed NO amendments to the budget whatsoever.You will find details of both proposed amendments below, along with a link to the actual text of the Balow amendment. To find out which representatives supported the PFL, see http://www.legis.state.wi.us/2003/data/votes/av0163.pdf. Remember, the NO votes are the ones actually in favor of the PFL. |
Press Release Issued March 13, 2003Balow to Offer Pet Facilities Law Amendment
|
|
Rep. Tom Lothian's proposal apparently fell victim to Republican party policy of no amendments to this year's budget. Representative Lothian has not yet issued a press release on his proposal, but has officially submitted for consideration an amendment that would restore the Pet Facilities Act, including inspection and licensing program. He is taking the approach that the PFL would be a sound budgetary move. According to an aide, "Pet licensing and pet facilities inspection and licensing program as proposed by DATCP would generate $427,261.20 annually. Total cost of program is $421,000 annually. Revenue estimate is conservative as it does not factor in fines generated through inspections and enforcement. It also benefits local law enforcement who would realize increased relief from investigation of facilities as the DATCP inspection program matures. HIGHLIGHTS:
|
|
Denis de Rougement |
Home *
The Reintroduced PFL (pdf) * Recommended Administrative Rules (pdf ) * Acrobat Reader
AB 536 Authors and Cosponsors * Our Supporters * Funding Analysis